Who's Really To Blame For The Economy? - Page 2

milesteg · 06-19-2009, 09:42 AM

Originally Posted by Sheikh Zubeer

I watched the Zeitgeist Addendum, they go in detail about the Federal Reserve and the money supply.

I'll watch Money Masters and Freedom to Fascism on my spanking new iPhone.

Just to feel more liberal

This isn't liberalism.

The "left" or "Democrats" are actually for the Jews/Banks. It's the uber far right wing that has been keen to kill the Fed.

No one is more surprised than me, but really, I think Dem/Rep and Lib/Cons are made up dichotomies. Really NO ONE likes these pricks accept for the politicians they bribe.

Sheikh Zubeer · 06-19-2009, 09:44 AM

It's amazing how very few care that the Federal Reserve is a secretive private corporation and is the real power behind scenes.

The media doesn't talk about it.

In Zeutgeist Addendum, they explained how the whole system was flawed and how it's all based on debt.

milesteg · 06-19-2009, 09:57 AM

The solution is simple, Mike Gravel knows it. You simply tell the banks to "Fuck off, we're not gonna pay. Now get the fuck out of our country before we put you in handcuffs."

Sheikh Zubeer · 06-19-2009, 10:33 AM

^^

LMAO

That is THE solution.

I'm sure if the U.S. is on the brink of financial /economic disaster, they'll take over the Federal Reserve.

The U.S. is one of a few countries (or the only one ?) that does not print it's own currency.

Most countries, the Central Bank prints the nation's money supply, and is controlled by the government.

spaz · 06-19-2009, 10:52 AM

Have you guys seen this video. Very good video explaining how money is created.

.
.
Part 1 of 5

.
.
Part 2 of 5

.
.
Part 3 of 5

.
.
Part 4 of 5

.
.
Part 5 of 5

RapeChoke · 06-19-2009, 11:00 AM

Originally Posted by Sheikh Zubeer

^^

LMAO

That is THE solution.

I'm sure if the U.S. is on the brink of financial /economic disaster, they'll take over the Federal Reserve.

The U.S. is one of a few countries (or the only one ?) that does not print it's own currency.

Most countries, the Central Bank prints the nation's money supply, and is controlled by the government.

You're fucking stupid. all the central banks are under the same umbrella corporation. the 5 Rothschilds sons went to five cities, Paris, London etc....
Miles; See House of Rothschild.

RapeChoke · 06-19-2009, 11:07 AM

Originally Posted by spaz

Have you guys seen this video. Very good video explaining how money is created.

.
.
Part 1 of 5

.
.
Part 2 of 5

.
.
Part 3 of 5

.
.
Part 4 of 5

.
.
Part 5 of 5

well done spaz, that is a very good video and easy to digest as well.

jarwillie · 06-19-2009, 11:41 AM

Originally Posted by Sheikh Zubeer

I watched the Zeitgeist Addendum, they go in detail about the Federal Reserve and the money supply.

I'll watch Money Masters and Freedom to Fascism on my spanking new iPhone.

Just to feel more liberal

Sheikh, WTF is that? You don't even know what you are.

jarwillie · 06-19-2009, 11:43 AM

This is the stuff I been saying for a awhile and getting laughed at for.

Ron Paul has a lot more supporters in the government. He was on the Andrew Wilkow show the otherday and he had a list of senators and congressmen in support of abolishing the federal reserve

jarwillie · 06-19-2009, 11:57 AM

sparky204 · 06-20-2009, 02:10 AM

I understand what is going on but i dont see the harm in a global currency or global government. Have you fucks not watched star trek.

I know a lot of this new world order stuff says keep population under 500 million.
All these conspircy nuts thinks that means automaticly kill off the remaining people in the world which is crazy.

If everybody in the world only had one child. The population would drop in half. Then if those people only had one child the population would drop another 25%. Nobody would have to be killled and it could be achieved in less then 140 years.

Which according to things like zeitgeist and end game or obama deception is not out of the question to think these NWO controllers would not wait another 150 years to bring the population to their accetable standard. I mean they have waited over 100 years already to bring their plot this far.

Sheikh Zubeer · 06-20-2009, 02:43 AM

Originally Posted by RapeChoke

You're fucking stupid. all the central banks are under the same umbrella corporation. the 5 Rothschilds sons went to five cities, Paris, London etc....
Miles; See House of Rothschild.

You fool , you naive little fool.

Don't say 'all' when you have no clue what you're babbling about -

You can talk about former European currencies, the dollar, but kiss the top of my peen when you talk shit you don't understand.

Sheikh Zubeer · 06-20-2009, 02:44 AM

Originally Posted by jarwillie

Sheikh, WTF is that? You don't even know what you are.

I'm not anything really -

villin · 06-20-2009, 04:03 AM

Originally Posted by sparky204

I understand what is going on but i dont see the harm in a global currency or global government. Have you fucks not watched star trek.

I know a lot of this new world order stuff says keep population under 500 million.
All these conspircy nuts thinks that means automaticly kill off the remaining people in the world which is crazy.

If everybody in the world only had one child. The population would drop in half. Then if those people only had one child the population would drop another 25%. Nobody would have to be killled and it could be achieved in less then 140 years.

Which according to things like zeitgeist and end game or obama deception is not out of the question to think these NWO controllers would not wait another 150 years to bring the population to their accetable standard. I mean they have waited over 100 years already to bring their plot this far.

A globally unified society is undoubtably a good thing but it depends on the manner in which it was established. You can't have the top 1% of the population weilding 99% of the power.

There is currently no means of establishing a stable global government. A UN type model is flawed in that you still do not have true unity, merely factions looking out for their own interests and crippling uniformity. An Empire model is flawed due to corruption and in-fighting. We simply lack the maturity as a global society to achieve peace and equality for all.

Population growth is a severe problem but the planet is quite capable of sustaining several times the current global population. The real problem is that the population growth is concentrated in third world countries that lack the facilities to properly educate, care for and sustain a population increase. Controlled reproduction rates that you indicated do not hit the heart of the problem, they merely undermine developed nations while maintaining the status quo in less developed nations. The only population controls that would be effective are too controversial to gain widespread acceptance. Nobody wants to accept the fact that people living in squallor who pump out large numbers of kids that they can't support should be erradicated for the collective good. In this case, a little genocide is a healthy thing.

milesteg · 06-20-2009, 03:09 PM

Originally Posted by sparky204

I understand what is going on but i dont see the harm in a global currency or global government. Have you fucks not watched star trek.

I know a lot of this new world order stuff says keep population under 500 million.
All these conspircy nuts thinks that means automaticly kill off the remaining people in the world which is crazy.

If everybody in the world only had one child. The population would drop in half. Then if those people only had one child the population would drop another 25%. Nobody would have to be killled and it could be achieved in less then 140 years.

Which according to things like zeitgeist and end game or obama deception is not out of the question to think these NWO controllers would not wait another 150 years to bring the population to their accetable standard. I mean they have waited over 100 years already to bring their plot this far.

I can't speak to the goals of the "NWO" or "Illuminati" or any other secret society or what not.

But the point of a one world currency isn't whether or not it's a good thing. The point is that governments around the world are being forced and cajoled into things by people nobody elected.

You mention Star Trek. I'll tell you what star trek DIDN'T have, BANKS - MONTHLY BILLS - COMPELLED LABOR or DEBT.

You give me all of those things and I'm right on board with a one world currency.

But what we don't want, is some fuckin banker taking over the world by means of currency. In Star Trek Explorers and Scientists ran the society, not some filthy banker.

Obviously if we're all on one form of currency, how powerful is the banker who prints the money?